Is it possible to have 69 kids

However, the more children you have in the womb, the more likely it is that your labor will come earlier. According to the BBC calculations , Mrs. If we add all this up, we get weeks. A year consists of 52 weeks, so if we divide the resulting numbers, we get 18 years. So, Mrs. Vassilyeva had to spend 18 entire years of her life with a belly bump. While theoretically, Mrs.

Vassilyeva had enough time to carry all the babies, there are a couple more facts to consider. There was a list sent by the Nikolskiy monastery to Moscow on February 27, , which proved Feodor Vassilyev had 82 children alive at that time, from 2 marriages.

The data from the list was published in in the Saint-Petersburg Panorama. These companies are recommended by at least three top-performing newsletters and have low valuations. After a breakthrough in , NIO Inc. NYSE: NIO hit the roadblock in , with periods of extreme volatility — typical for a high growth stock in a dynamic environment. While the EV market has been like a tide, lifting everything in the path, eventually, that tide will have to go out. Only then, as Warren Buffett famously said, we will discover who's been swimming naked.

Investors are constantly looking for stocks that will yield massive returns. That being said, finding these stocks can seem like an overwhelming task. Not to mention it can be expensive. Some of the most well-known names like Amazon and Alphabet can put you out thousands of dollars for just a single share. Using the TipRanks database, we were able to pinpoint two stocks with massive u.

After a mixed session on Saturday, Bitcoin makes an early move. After the recent pullback, the big data specialist's stock is now down roughly 3. It makes sense for GE Digital to be included with the power and renewable energy businesses because its main focus is on energy right now. How individual shareholders, who can expect to own shares in both, are affected by the news. Dow 30 36, Nasdaq 15, Russell 2, Crude Oil Gold 1, Silver CMC Crypto 1, FTSE 7, These bunches of eggs could then be surgically removed and fertilised in vitro, outside the body, for subsequent surgical placement into the uterus of an army of surrogate mothers, who would carry the foetus or foetuses to term.

Each one could potentially have twins — or more. From a reproductive perspective, then, women could therefore be more like men — with the capability of mothering hundreds if not thousands of children, leaving Mrs Vassilyev in the dust. Tilly makes clear that his research is not in any way intended to open the doors to women having thousands of children.

The idea is to aid the fertility of those who are struggling. Still, he's hopeful it might level the playing field when it comes to fertility across the genders. Men can father hundreds of children: what if science could allow women to do the same? Credit: SPL. After all, human males produce millions of sperm daily throughout their lives, meaning they have essentially no natural limit to how many children they might sire other than available, ovulating partners.

The conqueror and possibly inveterate rapist Genghis Khan likely fathered hundreds of children across his continent-of-Asia-spanning empire approximately years ago; genetic evidence implies some 16 million people alive today are descended from him. Assuming his research fully pans out, when it comes to practically answering the question of biological progeny, "male fertility doesn't really have a limit," Lilly says, "and women's doesn't, either. Clearly, this scenario of mothers with countless children would cause quite a stir if it comes to pass — perhaps even more so than the 69 children of Mrs Vassilyev.

Would a man who fathered scores of children nowadays raise the same hackles, though, and if not, is that fair? Says Tilly on the matter: "There really should be no difference between the sexes. Ultimate Limits Sex. Did one woman really give birth to 69 children? Share using Email.

By Adam Hadhazy 21st October Conceiving and raising one child is demanding enough — yet historical reports suggest that one woman bore Are they true? And will modern medicine push the limit even further? A woman could, in theory, become the mother to more children than we ever thought possible.

Mrs Vassilyev would have been pregnant for 18 years in total. But whether that would be possible in reality is another matter. The ability to become pregnant goes down with each pregnancy, as successive labours take their toll. Surviving labour The hurdles for ushering 69 children into the world hardly stop there, however. An awful lot of nippers Mrs Vassilyev's multiple conceptions of twins, triplets and quadruplets further strains credibility. A propensity to have twins runs in families, so could Mrs Vassilyev have been extreme example?

Brave new world So what is the actual limit? The fact that surrogate mothers can now carry the biological fetuses of other people potentially increases the maximum number of children possible within one family.

In theory, women could be more like men — with the capability of mothering hundreds if not thousands of children. As soon as we start talking about the infinite possibility of female fertility, people get crazy — Jonathan Tilly.

Around the BBC.